Original Research
Die ingeborenheid-hipotese van die TGG en Dooyeweerd se filosofie
Koers - Bulletin for Christian Scholarship/Bulletin vir Christelike Wetenskap | Vol 61, No 1 | a588 |
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/koers.v61i1.588
| © 1996 A.W. Coetzee
| This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 11 January 1996 | Published: 11 January 1996
Submitted: 11 January 1996 | Published: 11 January 1996
About the author(s)
A.W. Coetzee, Dept. Klassieke & Semitistiek Potchefstroomse Universiteit vir CHO POTCHEFSTROOMFull Text:
PDF (512KB)Abstract
In this article certain presuppositions of the innateness hypothesis of the TGG are judged by comparing it to aspects from the philosophy of Dooyeweerd. It is indicated that: (i) the TGG as well as Dooyeweerd postulates a radical structural distinction between man and animal but on different grounds; (ii) the intertwined unity of human nature is not fully recognised by the TGG; (iii) the complementary role o f man and reality in determining the structure of knowledge is acknowledged by both the TGG and Dooyeweerd. On these grounds it is stated that the TGG can not uncritically be accommodated into Dooyeweerd's philosophical framework.
Keywords
No related keywords in the metadata.
Metrics
Total abstract views: 858Total article views: 895
Reader Comments
Before posting a comment, read our privacy policy.Post a comment (login required)