Original Research

When 'paradigms' differ: scientific communication between skepticism and hope in recent philosophy of science

R. Coletto
Koers - Bulletin for Christian Scholarship/Bulletin vir Christelike Wetenskap | Vol 73, No 3 | a169 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/koers.v73i3.169 | © 2008 R. Coletto | This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 27 July 2008 | Published: 27 July 2008

About the author(s)

R. Coletto, School of Philosophy, Potchefstroom Campus, North-West University, South Africa

Full Text:

PDF (147KB)

Abstract

The first half of this article illustrates how contemporary humanist philosophy of science got caught up in a gradual loss of confidence concerning the possibility of sound communication among scholars holding on to different paradigms or presuppositions. The second half is dedicated to the responses provided by a Christian school of philosophy to the bleak possibility of a communication crisis. The resources deployed by the reformational school of philosophy are argued to constitute valuable instruments to create a more hopeful attitude towards scientific dialogue. A final note is dedicated to the possible causes of the difficulties experienced in this area of reflection by contemporary humanist philosophy of science.

Keywords

Reformational View Of Antithesis; Theory-Dependence Of Concepts And Statements; Framework-Dependence Of Theories; Incommensurability; Scientific Communication

Metrics

Total abstract views: 1064
Total article views: 1308

Reader Comments

Before posting a comment, read our privacy policy.

Post a comment (login required)

 

Crossref Citations

1. Christian philosophy of education in South Africa: the cultural-historical activity theory to the rescue?
Johannes van der Walt
Koers - Bulletin for Christian Scholarship  vol: 81  issue: 2  first page: 18  year: 2016  
doi: 10.19108/KOERS.81.2.2262