Original Research
"Bewitching" or confusing methaphysics? The demarcation between science and metaphysics according to Karl Popper
Koers - Bulletin for Christian Scholarship/Bulletin vir Christelike Wetenskap | Vol 51, No 4 | a942 |
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/koers.v51i4.942
| © 1986 M. Elaine Botha
| This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 31 January 1986 | Published: 31 January 1986
Submitted: 31 January 1986 | Published: 31 January 1986
About the author(s)
M. Elaine Botha, Department of Philosphy, PU for CHE, South AfricaFull Text:
PDF (188KB)Abstract
The problems of both classical and modern theory of knowledge, according to Popper, reside in the problem of demarcation: a problem closely re lated to the problem of induction. The paper argues the view that Popper's view of metaphysics is ambiguous, requiring another criterion to distinguish between "good " and "bad " metaphysics. The sources of the problem are pinpointed, and Popper's distinction between three types of theory outlined. The article then explores the distinction between types of theories and the issues of falsification, testability and refutation, before going on to a consideration of the relationship between science and metaphysics, and w eighing up the issue of good ancid metaphysics. From this emerges clearly that the second "criterionot demarcation" is needed to make precisely this distinction; also in view of Popper's u n clear, even ambiguous, view of metaphysics.
Keywords
No related keywords in the metadata.
Metrics
Total abstract views: 1351Total article views: 1647
Reader Comments
Before posting a comment, read our privacy policy.Post a comment (login required)
Crossref Citations
1. The re-appreciation of the humanities in contemporary philosophy of science: From recognition to exaggeration?
Renato Coletto
Koers - Bulletin for Christian Scholarship vol: 78 issue: 2 year: 2013
doi: 10.4102/koers.v78i2.64