Original Research
Rationality and universality: conditions and orderliness - on the border of concept and idea
Koers - Bulletin for Christian Scholarship/Bulletin vir Christelike Wetenskap | Vol 53, No 4 | a894 |
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/koers.v53i4.894
| © 1988 Daniel F.M. Strauss
| This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 30 January 1988 | Published: 30 January 1988
Submitted: 30 January 1988 | Published: 30 January 1988
About the author(s)
Daniel F.M. Strauss, Department of Philosophy, University of the Orange Free State, South AfricaFull Text:
PDF (540KB)Abstract
Throughout the history of Western philosophy knowledge was closely related to universality and to conceptual knowledge - supposedly constituting the core meaning of rationality: rational knowing should be conceptual if it is to be recognized as knowing at all. Although Aristotle clearly realized that individuality is not conceptually knowable, he side stepped this problem by introducing his secondary universal substantia form in order to safe-guard (conceptual) knowledge. A brief analysis of the further historical development of the relationship between universality and particularity paves the way for discussing the manner in which Dooyeweerd and Vollenhoven tackled this problem.
Keywords
No related keywords in the metadata.
Metrics
Total abstract views: 927Total article views: 1264
Reader Comments
Before posting a comment, read our privacy policy.Post a comment (login required)