Original Research

Rationality and universality: conditions and orderliness - on the border of concept and idea

Daniel F.M. Strauss
Koers - Bulletin for Christian Scholarship/Bulletin vir Christelike Wetenskap | Vol 53, No 4 | a894 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/koers.v53i4.894 | © 1988 Daniel F.M. Strauss | This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 30 January 1988 | Published: 30 January 1988

About the author(s)

Daniel F.M. Strauss, Department of Philosophy, University of the Orange Free State, South Africa

Full Text:

PDF (540KB)

Abstract

Throughout the history of Western philosophy knowledge was closely related to universality and to conceptual knowledge - supposedly constituting the core meaning of rationality: rational knowing should be conceptual if it is to be recognized as knowing at all. Although Aristotle clearly realized that individuality is not conceptually knowable, he side stepped this problem by introducing his secondary universal substantia form in order to safe-guard (conceptual) knowledge. A brief analysis of the further historical development of the relationship between universality and particularity paves the way for discussing the manner in which Dooyeweerd and Vollenhoven tackled this problem.

Keywords

No related keywords in the metadata.

Metrics

Total abstract views: 927
Total article views: 1264

Reader Comments

Before posting a comment, read our privacy policy.

Post a comment (login required)

Crossref Citations

No related citations found.