Original Research
‘Ideological’ fallacies1
Koers - Bulletin for Christian Scholarship/Bulletin vir Christelike Wetenskap | Vol 59, No 1 | a655 |
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/koers.v59i1.655
| © 1994 Pieter van Veuren
| This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 24 January 1994 | Published: 24 January 1994
Submitted: 24 January 1994 | Published: 24 January 1994
About the author(s)
Pieter van Veuren, Department of Philosophy Rand Afrikaans University JohannesburgFull Text:
PDF (411KB)Abstract
The aim of this paper is to extend the critique which informal logic employs against fallacious reasoning to a critique of ideological argumentation. Two main problems are addressed: the first problem concerns criteria for the identification of 'ideological' fallacies, and the second concerns the place which ‘ideological’ fallacies are to be accorded in a ‘taxonomy' of fallacies. I address the first problem by developing a critical concept of ideology: argumentative ideological discourse serves to justify relations of domination and exploitation and is potentially misleading. Two illustrative examples of 'ideological' fallacy are presented: an ‘appeal to public interest' and an ‘appeal to the will of God’. In addressing the second problem, I argue that these ‘ideological' fallacies may best be classified as typical variations of main classes of fallacies which are traditionally distinguished (inconsistent premises and relevance).
Keywords
No related keywords in the metadata.
Metrics
Total abstract views: 948Total article views: 1118
Reader Comments
Before posting a comment, read our privacy policy.Post a comment (login required)