Original Research

Mechanistic individualism versus organistic totalitarianism

J.J. Venter
Koers - Bulletin for Christian Scholarship/Bulletin vir Christelike Wetenskap | Vol 62, No 1 | a558 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/koers.v62i1.558 | © 1997 J.J. Venter | This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 10 January 1997 | Published: 10 January 1997

About the author(s)

J.J. Venter, Department o f Philosophy Potchefstroom University for CHE POTCHEFSTROOM

Full Text:

PDF (679KB)

Abstract

Mechanistic individualism versus organistic totalitarianism

In this article it is argued that the organistic world picture, when functioning as a world view, is associated with a totalitarian view of social relationships, usually promoting the interests o f the state or the ethnic group as the interests which should dominate. This is illustrated by referring to the social ideas of Hobbes, Rousseau, D.H. Lawrence and Mussolini. The mechanistic world picture, however, when functioning as a world view, is associated with individualism, according to which the individuals have a relatively independent existence; it suggests that justice and morality are the automatic products of the equilibrating process. Cases in point: Hobbes, Adam Smith, Kant, Darwin, New-Classical and Monetarist economics. Finally (in Neo-Calvinist vein) it is argued that the application o f such worldviewish metaphors should be limited, so that justice can be done to both the differentiation of social relationships and their integration.


Keywords

No related keywords in the metadata.

Metrics

Total abstract views: 1062
Total article views: 1532

Reader Comments

Before posting a comment, read our privacy policy.

Post a comment (login required)

Crossref Citations

No related citations found.