Original Research
A cosmopolitan politics of loyalty
Koers - Bulletin for Christian Scholarship/Bulletin vir Christelike Wetenskap | Vol 69, No 3 | a313 |
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/koers.v69i3.313
| © 2004 M. Heyns
| This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 31 July 2004 | Published: 31 July 2004
Submitted: 31 July 2004 | Published: 31 July 2004
About the author(s)
M. Heyns, School of Philosophy, Potchefstroom Campus, North-West University, South AfricaFull Text:
PDF (133KB)Abstract
While focusing on the thought of Charles Taylor the question whether the politics of loyalty can be part of a transcendental structure for society is discussed in this article. Classical patriotism, for instance, involves loyalty to public institutions and laws to enhance self-rule. In the twentieth century, however, classical patriotism became fused with nationalism (i.e. loyalty to culture), resulting in many instances in human suffering. Part of the explanation for this derailment is to be found in the Taylorian concept of the hypertrophy of autonomous freedom. The argument developed in this article links up with trends in liberalism and Taylor’s own reasoning that hypertrophy can be curbed within a transcendental structure for society (i.e. a cosmopolitan politics of loyalty). However, in the liberalist trends (and also in Taylor’s thought) tension exists between such a structure and the perception that loyalty politics is a mere particularism. As alternative I propose engagement between the cosmopolitan perspective and the various loyalties, with the latter a transcendental principle that needs to be applied in collaboration with other principles.
Keywords
Cosmopolitanism; Nationalism; Patriotism; Charles Taylor
Metrics
Total abstract views: 1094Total article views: 1353
Reader Comments
Before posting a comment, read our privacy policy.Post a comment (login required)