Original Research
Adopting a human rights based approach to international Christian development
Koers - Bulletin for Christian Scholarship/Bulletin vir Christelike Wetenskap | Vol 79, No 2 | a2130 |
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/koers.v79i2.2130
| © 2014 Stanley Arumugam
| This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 13 July 2013 | Published: 19 November 2014
Submitted: 13 July 2013 | Published: 19 November 2014
About the author(s)
Stanley Arumugam, ActionAid International, Johannesburg, South AfricaAbstract
It is only in the past decade that religion has been recognised as critical to ensuring sustainable international development efforts. This is due in large part to the failure of the dominant development paradigm of Western secularism in the global South. This article focuses on the significant historical contribution of evangelical Christianity in international development and explores some of the ideological tensions that challenge partnership with secular organisations. The resulting separate and parallel efforts of evangelical Christianity and the international non-governmental organisations (INGO) sector are costly and counter-productive in serving the poor. Recently, many INGOs have adopted the human rights-based approach underpinned by its commitment to social justice and solidarity with the poor – values also central to the Bible. It will be argued that this shared approach could provide the necessary bridge to facilitate deeper engagement in the form of social action between secular development actors and evangelicals. The critical role of evangelical Christianity in addressing poverty as a human rights issue in South Africa is also dealt with briefly.
Keywords
No related keywords in the metadata.
Metrics
Total abstract views: 1442Total article views: 2645
Reader Comments
Before posting a comment, read our privacy policy.Post a comment (login required)
Crossref Citations
1. Leadership challenges in Christian non-governmental organisations
Ana Maria Cabodevila
HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies vol: 76 issue: 2 year: 2020
doi: 10.4102/hts.v76i2.5944