Original Research
Historiese kritiek en die ou testament
Koers - Bulletin for Christian Scholarship/Bulletin vir Christelike Wetenskap | Vol 46, No 2 | a1088 |
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/koers.v46i2.1088
| © 1981 H. F. Van Rooy
| This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 04 February 1981 | Published: 04 February 1981
Submitted: 04 February 1981 | Published: 04 February 1981
About the author(s)
H. F. Van Rooy, Dept. Semitiese Tale, P.U. vir C.H.O., South AfricaFull Text:
PDF (254KB)Abstract
The issue surrounding the value o f the various historicocritical methods of exegesis is dealt with in this article. The various methods (Form criticism, Lite rary criticism, History o f transmission, Redaction history and Tradition history) are explicated and discussed Literary criticism deals with the written sources used for the compilation o f a work. Form criticism is coricemed with the form in which statements have been poured. History o f transmission (Uberleferungsgeschichte) looks at the transmission o f a certain section, also within the con text o f the period in which it was written down. Tradition history looks at the development and the run of specific traditions, such as the exodus from Egypt. Redaction history is concerned with the redaction or editing of a work, until it assumes its final shape.
Keywords
No related keywords in the metadata.
Metrics
Total abstract views: 897Total article views: 927
Reader Comments
Before posting a comment, read our privacy policy.Post a comment (login required)
Crossref Citations
1. Die gebruik van ‘Skrifkritiek’: ’n Herbesinning
H.J.M. Van Deventer
In die Skriflig/In Luce Verbi vol: 50 issue: 2 year: 2016
doi: 10.4102/ids.v50i2.2159