Original Research

Historiese kritiek en die ou testament

H. F. Van Rooy
Koers - Bulletin for Christian Scholarship/Bulletin vir Christelike Wetenskap | Vol 46, No 2 | a1088 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/koers.v46i2.1088 | © 1981 H. F. Van Rooy | This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 04 February 1981 | Published: 04 February 1981

About the author(s)

H. F. Van Rooy, Dept. Semitiese Tale, P.U. vir C.H.O., South Africa

Full Text:

PDF (254KB)

Abstract

The issue surrounding the value o f the various historicocritical methods of exegesis is dealt with in this article. The various methods (Form criticism, Lite­ rary criticism, History o f transmission, Redaction history and Tradition history) are explicated and discussed Literary criticism deals with the written sources used for the compilation o f a work. Form criticism is coricemed with the form in which statements have been poured. History o f transmission (Uberleferungsgeschichte) looks at the transmission o f a certain section, also within the con­ text o f the period in which it was written down. Tradition history looks at the development and the run of specific traditions, such as the exodus from Egypt. Redaction history is concerned with the redaction or editing of a work, until it assumes its final shape.

Keywords

No related keywords in the metadata.

Metrics

Total abstract views: 897
Total article views: 927

Reader Comments

Before posting a comment, read our privacy policy.

Post a comment (login required)

 

Crossref Citations

1. Die gebruik van ‘Skrifkritiek’: ’n Herbesinning
H.J.M. Van Deventer
In die Skriflig/In Luce Verbi  vol: 50  issue: 2  year: 2016  
doi: 10.4102/ids.v50i2.2159