Original Research
Innate rights and just relations 1
Koers - Bulletin for Christian Scholarship/Bulletin vir Christelike Wetenskap | Vol 56, No 2 | a737 |
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/koers.v56i2.737
| © 1991 Paul Marshall
| This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 25 January 1991 | Published: 25 January 1991
Submitted: 25 January 1991 | Published: 25 January 1991
About the author(s)
Paul Marshall, Department of Political Theory Institute for Christian Studies TORONTO, South AfricaFull Text:
PDF (299KB)Abstract
Currently the terms rights is and human rights are used to refer to two types of entities. One is a kind of legal claim or guarantee given in positive law. The other is a purported moral claim or interest implicit in the nature of human persons. A peculiar feature of modem discussions of rights is that these diverse things are commonly treated as if they had some necessary relation to one another. In fact, historically and conceptually, they do not and the frequent attempts to relate them can have inimical results. It can confuse substantive human rights with the promulgation of an individualist view of the person. The defence of human rights (of the types now mentioned in international treaties) would be helped by divorcing these from a notion of innate rights and, instead, understanding rights as legal guarantees of just political relations.
Keywords
No related keywords in the metadata.
Metrics
Total abstract views: 848Total article views: 939
Reader Comments
Before posting a comment, read our privacy policy.Post a comment (login required)
Crossref Citations
1. Two Types of Rights
Paul Marshall
Canadian Journal of Political Science vol: 25 issue: 4 first page: 661 year: 1992
doi: 10.1017/S0008423900004443