Original Research

Nuances in the Philosophy of the Cosmonomic Idea

Marinus D. Stafleu
Koers - Bulletin for Christian Scholarship/Bulletin vir Christelike Wetenskap | Vol 79, No 3 | a423 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/koers.v79i3.423 | © 2014 Marinus D. Stafleu | This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 11 September 2012 | Published: 11 August 2014

About the author(s)

Marinus D. Stafleu, Independent researcher, Netherlands

Abstract

This article comments on Danie Strauss’s Philosophy: Discipline of the disciplines. It deals with some differences between the author’s interpretation of the Philosophy of the Cosmonomic Idea and the views of Dooyeweerd and Strauss. I call these differences ‘nuances’ because our religious starting point is the same. This implies a realist religious view, confessing that God created the world according to laws which are invariant because He sustains them. We know God only through Jesus Christ, who submitted himself to God’s laws. Partial knowledge of God’s laws can be achieved by studying the law-conformity of the creation. In particular, I shall discuss the relevance of artefacts for the future development of the Philosophy of the Cosmonomic Idea.

Keywords

No related keywords in the metadata.

Metrics

Total abstract views: 1257
Total article views: 2430

Reader Comments

Before posting a comment, read our privacy policy.

Post a comment (login required)

 

Crossref Citations

1. Nuanses in die filosofie van die wetsidee
Helena Hoogstad
Koers - Bulletin for Christian Scholarship  vol: 79  issue: 3  year: 2014  
doi: 10.4102/koers.v79i3.2197